<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Website Success: Part Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.natarem.com/2008/02/24/website-success-part-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.natarem.com/2008/02/24/website-success-part-two/</link>
	<description>You met me at a very strange time in my life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 08:52:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Website Success: Part Four</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2008/02/24/website-success-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-3904</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Success: Part Four</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 22:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/2008/02/24/website-success-part-two/#comment-3904</guid>
		<description>[...] is a followup to Website Success: Part One, Website Success: Part Two and Website Success: Part [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a followup to Website Success: Part One, Website Success: Part Two and Website Success: Part [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Success: Part Three</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2008/02/24/website-success-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-3875</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Success: Part Three</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/2008/02/24/website-success-part-two/#comment-3875</guid>
		<description>[...] This is a followup to Website Success: Part One and Website Success: Part Two. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is a followup to Website Success: Part One and Website Success: Part Two. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2008/02/24/website-success-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-3871</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/2008/02/24/website-success-part-two/#comment-3871</guid>
		<description>First off. I am big fan of your blog and appreciate all you have done for poker...

I just have to say that your post are somewhat contradictory. You say, &quot;If someone ever finds a better way to do search, Google will ultimately be crushed&quot;In your last  post you talk about peoples ignorance to better products. &quot;For example, an incredible number of people use the actual AIM client because, quite frankly, they don’t care enough to look around for something better like pidgin or digsby.

I agree with your overall theme that self interest is a inherent motive to do things. I just think the example you gave with google is unsound. The world seems to work a lot more like your example of AIM clients, people like familiarity, comfort, etc. its human nature to repeat things that you like and feel at ease with.  It would take a lot more then some company creating a better search engine to compete with google. They would basically have to re-create the way we currently use a search engine all together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off. I am big fan of your blog and appreciate all you have done for poker&#8230;</p>
<p>I just have to say that your post are somewhat contradictory. You say, &#8220;If someone ever finds a better way to do search, Google will ultimately be crushed&#8221;In your last  post you talk about peoples ignorance to better products. &#8220;For example, an incredible number of people use the actual AIM client because, quite frankly, they don’t care enough to look around for something better like pidgin or digsby.</p>
<p>I agree with your overall theme that self interest is a inherent motive to do things. I just think the example you gave with google is unsound. The world seems to work a lot more like your example of AIM clients, people like familiarity, comfort, etc. its human nature to repeat things that you like and feel at ease with.  It would take a lot more then some company creating a better search engine to compete with google. They would basically have to re-create the way we currently use a search engine all together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
