<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Things I Wished Online Poker Sites Had</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/09/things-i-wished-online-poker-sites-had/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/09/things-i-wished-online-poker-sites-had/</link>
	<description>You met me at a very strange time in my life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 08:52:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/09/things-i-wished-online-poker-sites-had/comment-page-1/#comment-8362</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/?p=700#comment-8362</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great idea -- I&#039;d actually never thought of that last one.  Thanks!

Re: standardizing blinds.  That&#039;s a good idea also.  I used to have a script that did that for me on Party, but I don&#039;t think any site has officially implemented it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great idea &#8212; I&#8217;d actually never thought of that last one.  Thanks!</p>
<p>Re: standardizing blinds.  That&#8217;s a good idea also.  I used to have a script that did that for me on Party, but I don&#8217;t think any site has officially implemented it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PFX</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/09/things-i-wished-online-poker-sites-had/comment-page-1/#comment-8361</link>
		<dc:creator>PFX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/?p=700#comment-8361</guid>
		<description>Great suggestions. 

I think the largest sites should create a section of cash game tables that have sign-up lists in 5 or 6 table increments, so that once 45 or 54 people have signed up for say 1/2 NL, then those players are randomly distributed to 5 or 6 new tables the way they would be in an MTT. Then as players leave and spots open, the wait list applies to all tables in that group, again with random seating placement.

I think these tables would be attractive to a certain segment of the poker population. The random seating would downplay the impact of data-mining programs and make collusion more difficult as players couldn&#039;t choose to sit with specific others. It would also encourage the opening of new instantly full tables instead of having 3-5 players waiting on each already full table because they don&#039;t like to play shorthanded while they wait for traditional style new tables to fill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great suggestions. </p>
<p>I think the largest sites should create a section of cash game tables that have sign-up lists in 5 or 6 table increments, so that once 45 or 54 people have signed up for say 1/2 NL, then those players are randomly distributed to 5 or 6 new tables the way they would be in an MTT. Then as players leave and spots open, the wait list applies to all tables in that group, again with random seating placement.</p>
<p>I think these tables would be attractive to a certain segment of the poker population. The random seating would downplay the impact of data-mining programs and make collusion more difficult as players couldn&#8217;t choose to sit with specific others. It would also encourage the opening of new instantly full tables instead of having 3-5 players waiting on each already full table because they don&#8217;t like to play shorthanded while they wait for traditional style new tables to fill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/09/things-i-wished-online-poker-sites-had/comment-page-1/#comment-8344</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/?p=700#comment-8344</guid>
		<description>Here comes another great feature: Standarize blinds.
Example: I play NL $400 and NL $600, but i want all the games to look like NL 100, so that the big blind is always 1 (or whatever i choose). With tables at different stakes I lose fractions of second everytime i switch tables, especially in the preflop raise, or in the pot size postflop. Also I tend to loosen up in lower buyin games, and standarizing would help me a lot.
What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here comes another great feature: Standarize blinds.<br />
Example: I play NL $400 and NL $600, but i want all the games to look like NL 100, so that the big blind is always 1 (or whatever i choose). With tables at different stakes I lose fractions of second everytime i switch tables, especially in the preflop raise, or in the pot size postflop. Also I tend to loosen up in lower buyin games, and standarizing would help me a lot.<br />
What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sprstoner</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/09/things-i-wished-online-poker-sites-had/comment-page-1/#comment-8339</link>
		<dc:creator>sprstoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/?p=700#comment-8339</guid>
		<description>def great ideas, most important is security imo.

stars did tell me they have a secure token option coming out soon, im not sure if it was true or how long soon is. but we need something better.

i would also really love to see synchronized breaks by both sites for us MTTers. i cant see the down side beside the work it would take to get it started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>def great ideas, most important is security imo.</p>
<p>stars did tell me they have a secure token option coming out soon, im not sure if it was true or how long soon is. but we need something better.</p>
<p>i would also really love to see synchronized breaks by both sites for us MTTers. i cant see the down side beside the work it would take to get it started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/09/things-i-wished-online-poker-sites-had/comment-page-1/#comment-8327</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/?p=700#comment-8327</guid>
		<description>&quot;poker site could greatly increase highstakes play by offering something like this.&quot;

The RSA security chip would also be well received by high stakes players.  Those chips are cheap and a package in the mail along with an explanation of &quot;we value your security and want to take extra steps in making sure your bankroll is protected&quot; would (I think) go a long ways.  Very good ideas here Nat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;poker site could greatly increase highstakes play by offering something like this.&#8221;</p>
<p>The RSA security chip would also be well received by high stakes players.  Those chips are cheap and a package in the mail along with an explanation of &#8220;we value your security and want to take extra steps in making sure your bankroll is protected&#8221; would (I think) go a long ways.  Very good ideas here Nat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
