<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rakeback Options</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/16/rakeback-options/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/16/rakeback-options/</link>
	<description>Greetings, Internets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:51:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/16/rakeback-options/comment-page-1/#comment-8452</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/?p=705#comment-8452</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have a lead on rakeback for Red Star?  I didn&#039;t sign up for rakeback with Cake, and Player&#039;s Only and Sportbook Poker don&#039;t take customers from Missouri.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have a lead on rakeback for Red Star?  I didn&#8217;t sign up for rakeback with Cake, and Player&#8217;s Only and Sportbook Poker don&#8217;t take customers from Missouri.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: makeutap247</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/16/rakeback-options/comment-page-1/#comment-8439</link>
		<dc:creator>makeutap247</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/?p=705#comment-8439</guid>
		<description>Carbon&#039;s 30% rakeback actually is worse than Full Tilt&#039;s 27%.  Full Tilt&#039;s uses the dealt rakeback method whereas Carbon uses the contributed method.  It would take higher than 30% for it to be the equivalent of Full Tilt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carbon&#8217;s 30% rakeback actually is worse than Full Tilt&#8217;s 27%.  Full Tilt&#8217;s uses the dealt rakeback method whereas Carbon uses the contributed method.  It would take higher than 30% for it to be the equivalent of Full Tilt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ispiked</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/16/rakeback-options/comment-page-1/#comment-8417</link>
		<dc:creator>ispiked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/?p=705#comment-8417</guid>
		<description>Although it wasn&#039;t widely announced, if you followed the forums close enough on 2+2, you would&#039;ve found a thread that talked about how to get rakeback for existing accounts on Full Tilt [1]. 

Essentially, you just e-mail support@rakebackpros.net with your Full Tilt account and usually they will create a rakeback account for you. (It took around two weeks for them to create an account for me.)

I realize this isn&#039;t the same as being able to choose your own affiliate, but it&#039;s still 27% rakeback, paid weekly, which is considerably more than 0%.

[1] http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/51/affiliates-rakeback/official-thread-rakebackpros-discussion-rb-existing-ft-accounts-181213/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it wasn&#8217;t widely announced, if you followed the forums close enough on 2+2, you would&#8217;ve found a thread that talked about how to get rakeback for existing accounts on Full Tilt [1]. </p>
<p>Essentially, you just e-mail <a href="mailto:support@rakebackpros.net">support@rakebackpros.net</a> with your Full Tilt account and usually they will create a rakeback account for you. (It took around two weeks for them to create an account for me.)</p>
<p>I realize this isn&#8217;t the same as being able to choose your own affiliate, but it&#8217;s still 27% rakeback, paid weekly, which is considerably more than 0%.</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/51/affiliates-rakeback/official-thread-rakebackpros-discussion-rb-existing-ft-accounts-181213/" rel="nofollow">http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/51/affiliates-rakeback/official-thread-rakebackpros-discussion-rb-existing-ft-accounts-181213/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/16/rakeback-options/comment-page-1/#comment-8410</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/?p=705#comment-8410</guid>
		<description>It would be fair to say that I stopped playing seriously after fulltilt banned my second account that I had created for rakeback. 

Rakeback was a great thing for people like me who go broke once a month, because there is always a reload on the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be fair to say that I stopped playing seriously after fulltilt banned my second account that I had created for rakeback. </p>
<p>Rakeback was a great thing for people like me who go broke once a month, because there is always a reload on the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/16/rakeback-options/comment-page-1/#comment-8408</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/?p=705#comment-8408</guid>
		<description>Yea, seems like Merge is trying to be the new Cake and growing rapidly in the US via the use of rakeback.  Sounds good to me though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, seems like Merge is trying to be the new Cake and growing rapidly in the US via the use of rakeback.  Sounds good to me though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

