Comments on: Rakeback Followup http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/20/rakeback-followup/ Greetings, Internets. Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:51:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: JJ Daigle http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/20/rakeback-followup/comment-page-1/#comment-8926 JJ Daigle Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:58:26 +0000 http://www.natarem.com/?p=708#comment-8926 I am holding 2 bad cashout checks from Playersonly. total of $800. they are stonewalling me on making them good. I am holding 2 bad cashout checks from Playersonly.
total of $800.
they are stonewalling me on making them good.

]]> By: Ben http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/20/rakeback-followup/comment-page-1/#comment-8515 Ben Tue, 23 Dec 2008 23:31:35 +0000 http://www.natarem.com/?p=708#comment-8515 Player's Only and Sportsbook are both owned by Jazette which owns a number of other cake skins and sportsbetting sites. They may not be stiffing poker players but they have a number of winning sportsbettors. You can check out some of the complaints about them at SportsBookReview. I don't think slow payments are a given players should just accept even under present conditions. PokerStars gets checks to me in around a weeks time. The situation may be tougher finding payment processors for sportsbooks but even Bodog has gotten it's act together and I'm now receiving checks from them in about ten days. Four-Eight weeks though is ludicrous! Player’s Only and Sportsbook are both owned by Jazette which owns a number of other cake skins and sportsbetting sites. They may not be stiffing poker players but they have a number of winning sportsbettors. You can check out some of the complaints about them at SportsBookReview.

I don’t think slow payments are a given players should just accept even under present conditions. PokerStars gets checks to me in around a weeks time. The situation may be tougher finding payment processors for sportsbooks but even Bodog has gotten it’s act together and I’m now receiving checks from them in about ten days. Four-Eight weeks though is ludicrous!

]]> By: Nat http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/20/rakeback-followup/comment-page-1/#comment-8507 Nat Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:34:50 +0000 http://www.natarem.com/?p=708#comment-8507 Interesting, I was unaware of the sportsbetting issue. I'd like to know more... any links? I don't think using the same payment processor is a problem though... right? Also, slow payments are somewhat a product of the times. At least they ARE paying people (from what I know). Interesting, I was unaware of the sportsbetting issue. I’d like to know more… any links?

I don’t think using the same payment processor is a problem though… right?

Also, slow payments are somewhat a product of the times. At least they ARE paying people (from what I know).

]]> By: Ben http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/20/rakeback-followup/comment-page-1/#comment-8503 Ben Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:22:51 +0000 http://www.natarem.com/?p=708#comment-8503 Can't say I really disagree with that and I must say I love your blog but if you're concerned with warning potential players about problem sites with potential payment problems I wouldn't be referring players to Player's Only. They may be promoted by some big affiliates but their parent company and the sites owned by them have stiffed a number sportsbettors. Not to mention they use the same payment processor as Cardspike and also tell players that payments take 4-8 weeks. Can’t say I really disagree with that and I must say I love your blog but if you’re concerned with warning potential players about problem sites with potential payment problems I wouldn’t be referring players to Player’s Only. They may be promoted by some big affiliates but their parent company and the sites owned by them have stiffed a number sportsbettors. Not to mention they use the same payment processor as Cardspike and also tell players that payments take 4-8 weeks.

]]> By: Nat http://www.natarem.com/2008/12/20/rakeback-followup/comment-page-1/#comment-8485 Nat Mon, 22 Dec 2008 04:22:39 +0000 http://www.natarem.com/?p=708#comment-8485 It really doesn't matter to me. If anyone who is owed money is not getting paid by CardSpike, then I feel like the room should not be supported by anyone. Especially considering the way they've given affiliates the run-around, I feel like CardSpike would be best off if they just folded their skin and moved on (after paying everyone what they're owed). It really doesn’t matter to me. If anyone who is owed money is not getting paid by CardSpike, then I feel like the room should not be supported by anyone. Especially considering the way they’ve given affiliates the run-around, I feel like CardSpike would be best off if they just folded their skin and moved on (after paying everyone what they’re owed).

]]>