<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Cares About Marching Bands?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.natarem.com/2010/01/08/who-cares-about-marching-bands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.natarem.com/2010/01/08/who-cares-about-marching-bands/</link>
	<description>You met me at a very strange time in my life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:49:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: niffe9</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2010/01/08/who-cares-about-marching-bands/comment-page-1/#comment-9859</link>
		<dc:creator>niffe9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/?p=902#comment-9859</guid>
		<description>&quot;Football fans and marching band fans don’t cross over that well. &quot;

I assure you that most people who attended big football schools also support their marching bands.  Networkds think it is worth showing as it&#039;s part of the college tradition and a big part of what makes college football different than the pros. It takes people back to the college gameday experience.  I have to admit though, if it&#039;s not my school or maybe a couple of other schools&#039; marching bands, I could care less.

&quot;I think tradition is a retarded argument for having things. It’s the same as saying someone should do such and such because it’s been done every year that way.&quot;

As irrational as tradition is, it still has a place.  Celebrating birthdays, new years, and christmas (I&#039;m not religious) is somewhat arbitrary and doesn&#039;t really hold any meaning, but they&#039;re still worthwhile traditions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Football fans and marching band fans don’t cross over that well. &#8221;</p>
<p>I assure you that most people who attended big football schools also support their marching bands.  Networkds think it is worth showing as it&#8217;s part of the college tradition and a big part of what makes college football different than the pros. It takes people back to the college gameday experience.  I have to admit though, if it&#8217;s not my school or maybe a couple of other schools&#8217; marching bands, I could care less.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think tradition is a retarded argument for having things. It’s the same as saying someone should do such and such because it’s been done every year that way.&#8221;</p>
<p>As irrational as tradition is, it still has a place.  Celebrating birthdays, new years, and christmas (I&#8217;m not religious) is somewhat arbitrary and doesn&#8217;t really hold any meaning, but they&#8217;re still worthwhile traditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2010/01/08/who-cares-about-marching-bands/comment-page-1/#comment-9851</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/?p=902#comment-9851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d much rather see random musical acts than bands.  Sometimes they might suck but at least they won&#039;t suck all the time.

Regarding Cory&#039;s question, it&#039;s only for the bowl games.  I have to think that they can find room in the budget for games that are on primetime ESPN to put musical acts on a stage.  It doesn&#039;t have to be like a Super Bowl halftime show or anything but I think the exposure on TV should make it very cheap to do something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d much rather see random musical acts than bands.  Sometimes they might suck but at least they won&#8217;t suck all the time.</p>
<p>Regarding Cory&#8217;s question, it&#8217;s only for the bowl games.  I have to think that they can find room in the budget for games that are on primetime ESPN to put musical acts on a stage.  It doesn&#8217;t have to be like a Super Bowl halftime show or anything but I think the exposure on TV should make it very cheap to do something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gambler2k4</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2010/01/08/who-cares-about-marching-bands/comment-page-1/#comment-9850</link>
		<dc:creator>gambler2k4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/?p=902#comment-9850</guid>
		<description>haha yea i agree with half time shows for big time games. i just thought you meant bands in general. i&#039;m pretty sure i switched the channel when i knew the band was gonna play at halftime on TV. bands can&#039;t really create new styles so we can pretty much expect the same thing over and over. if they had a band like limp bizket, i&#039;d listen to that halftime show (the exact point that you&#039;re getting at. one reason why they might do this is because it cost a lot of money to bring the big names into those type of atmospheres. now someone could say, &quot;yeah but it&#039;ll improve the ratings during halftime.&quot; i&#039;m not really sure how the ratings system and profits work, but maybe they&#039;re already capped so the school or whoever is hosting the bowl games would end up losing money in the longrun. so MAYBE it&#039;s the most +EV play from the profitability standpoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha yea i agree with half time shows for big time games. i just thought you meant bands in general. i&#8217;m pretty sure i switched the channel when i knew the band was gonna play at halftime on TV. bands can&#8217;t really create new styles so we can pretty much expect the same thing over and over. if they had a band like limp bizket, i&#8217;d listen to that halftime show (the exact point that you&#8217;re getting at. one reason why they might do this is because it cost a lot of money to bring the big names into those type of atmospheres. now someone could say, &#8220;yeah but it&#8217;ll improve the ratings during halftime.&#8221; i&#8217;m not really sure how the ratings system and profits work, but maybe they&#8217;re already capped so the school or whoever is hosting the bowl games would end up losing money in the longrun. so MAYBE it&#8217;s the most +EV play from the profitability standpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yappy Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2010/01/08/who-cares-about-marching-bands/comment-page-1/#comment-9849</link>
		<dc:creator>Yappy Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/?p=902#comment-9849</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure where you are from, Nat, but bands in the south are a huge deal and are loved for being a part of the football experience.  It&#039;s different everywhere, but a college game without bands would be one lacking direction and atmosphere.  Perhaps you want some remembrance of Ashley Simpson @ the national championship just a few years ago http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5YPiBx9MJs or maybe another boring performance by a band from the 70s (just to be safe.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure where you are from, Nat, but bands in the south are a huge deal and are loved for being a part of the football experience.  It&#8217;s different everywhere, but a college game without bands would be one lacking direction and atmosphere.  Perhaps you want some remembrance of Ashley Simpson @ the national championship just a few years ago <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5YPiBx9MJs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5YPiBx9MJs</a> or maybe another boring performance by a band from the 70s (just to be safe.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.natarem.com/2010/01/08/who-cares-about-marching-bands/comment-page-1/#comment-9848</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natarem.com/?p=902#comment-9848</guid>
		<description>I think tradition is a retarded argument for having things.  It&#039;s the same as saying someone should do such and such because it&#039;s been done every year that way.  I guess it&#039;s somehow comforting to humans to do that but I don&#039;t get it.  I actually think the best argument for traditions is that people will go along with them just because they are traditions and therefore it&#039;s easier to motivate people to do things (ie, buy merchandise, do certain cheers that pump up the team, etc).

Regarding bands more specifically, I am fine with them doing it during non-televised parts or doing it in the stands or whatever.  Even if they performed during halftime during the season during a random like Auburn-Tennessee game during week six or something that would be okay because no one really gives a shit about that game except for people associated with those schools and, maybe, some people in the state.  If it adds to the atmosphere, that&#039;s a totally legit reason to do it.  I don&#039;t think the halftime show adds to the atmosphere.

But for these big bowls, they really should do something more like the Orange Bowl where they did a Super Bowl style thing.  It&#039;s much more entertaining for the audience as a whole.  I don&#039;t think anyone (except former band members and family members) really sits there going &quot;man this band song is great, look how cool these formations are&quot;.

Like I said, just my opinion.  I go way off the deep end of rational thinking though.

And yes, Eric, sub is a total retard for betting against me.  But he insisted that I pick a winner in the Nat&#039;l Champ game so I did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think tradition is a retarded argument for having things.  It&#8217;s the same as saying someone should do such and such because it&#8217;s been done every year that way.  I guess it&#8217;s somehow comforting to humans to do that but I don&#8217;t get it.  I actually think the best argument for traditions is that people will go along with them just because they are traditions and therefore it&#8217;s easier to motivate people to do things (ie, buy merchandise, do certain cheers that pump up the team, etc).</p>
<p>Regarding bands more specifically, I am fine with them doing it during non-televised parts or doing it in the stands or whatever.  Even if they performed during halftime during the season during a random like Auburn-Tennessee game during week six or something that would be okay because no one really gives a shit about that game except for people associated with those schools and, maybe, some people in the state.  If it adds to the atmosphere, that&#8217;s a totally legit reason to do it.  I don&#8217;t think the halftime show adds to the atmosphere.</p>
<p>But for these big bowls, they really should do something more like the Orange Bowl where they did a Super Bowl style thing.  It&#8217;s much more entertaining for the audience as a whole.  I don&#8217;t think anyone (except former band members and family members) really sits there going &#8220;man this band song is great, look how cool these formations are&#8221;.</p>
<p>Like I said, just my opinion.  I go way off the deep end of rational thinking though.</p>
<p>And yes, Eric, sub is a total retard for betting against me.  But he insisted that I pick a winner in the Nat&#8217;l Champ game so I did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
